GBU100 Professional Business Communication
Assessment 3: Reflective Journal
| Assessment 3: Reflective journal (individual) | 30% | Week 12 | 1500 words |
Description/Task
Individual: Reflective journal
- Due: Week 12
- Task: Students write a reflective journal of 1500 words reflecting changes in your developing awareness of the practice and issues discussed within 11 weeks of studying related to Business Communication. Justify your thought with a specific example.
Considering the following in your reflective journal:
- Describe an event(s)/ experience.
- Interpret and evaluate your event(s)/ experience from your perspective (What do I think about it now? How does it relate to practices I learnt? How does it connect to discussed theories/ hypotheses?)
- Reflect on how the introduced hypotheses during the course will be useful to you or change your thought in communication.
Reflective Journal Structure
Refer to Appendix 1
Marking rubric
Refer to Appendix 2
Referencing
Your group’s report is required to consist at least 10 additional readings. Be aware of following strictly Harvard style format in both in-text reference and reference list.
Plagiarism
Use your own words to present your work. You are allowed to reach up to 10% of similarity. Assignments reaching up to 25% will be considered by lecturer. Assignments having more than 50% of similarity will be immediately marked “0” and reported to the institution for misconduct behaviour.
Get BEA603 Economics and Statistical Analysis Assignment Help
Feedback
Marks and feedback with comments will be provided to students within 2 weeks after submission. A rubric will be provided with the questions providing marking criteria. This will be used to mark and provide feedback to students.
Note: For all the requirements of submissions and integrity policies you must refer to the unit study guide provided. Please check on MyPIA Moodle site.
== End of Assessment brief==
Appendix 1
REFLECTIVE JOURNAL STRUCTURE
TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION:
- Introduce briefly about the unit GBU100
- Elicit briefly the content of your journal
REFLECTION
– Reflect on how the introduced knowledge has changed the way you communicate
– Reflect on how the unit has helped you become a better communicator
EVALUATION
- Discuss on what you like and do not like about the unit
RECOMMENDATION
– Recommend potential improvements for this unit
APPENDIX (if any)
REFERENCES
Marking rubric for Assessment 3
| Category | Excellent (8.5-10 points) | Very Good (7.5-8.4 points) | Good (6.5-7.4 points) | Satisfactory (5.0-6.4 points) | Not Satisfactory (<5.0 points) |
| Depth of reflection and application of key unit concepts | Reflection demonstrates a sophisticated degree of critical thinking in applying and analysing key unit concepts and theories. Accurate and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples which goes beyond minimum requirements. | Reflection demonstrates a substantial degree of critical thinking in applying and analysing key unit concepts. Accurate and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples which goes beyond minimum requirements. | Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying and/or analysing key unit concepts. Accurate connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. | Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying and/or analysing key unit concepts. Somewhat accurate connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. | Superficial connections are made with key unit concepts and theories. Examples drawn from l experience are irrelevant and/or incomplete to support the connections mentioned. |
| Personal development | Reflection conveys strong evidence on self-development with a substantial personal response to self-assessment and feedback received. Demonstrates significant awareness of areas of personal growth, developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions. | Reflection conveys good evidence on self-development with a substantial personal response to self-assessment and feedback received. Demonstrates significant awareness of areas of personal growth, developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions. | Conveys evidence of reflection on self-development with a personal response to self- assessment and feedback received. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made and examples presented. | Conveys limited evidence of reflection on self- development in response to self-assessment and feedback received. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, and examples presented. | Conveys inadequate evidence of reflection on self-development in response to self-assessment and feedback received. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates a neutral experience with negligible personal impact. |
| Implication for future | Demonstrates a conscious and thorough understanding of the learning to be gained from experience. Provides highly articulate and well-reasoned suggestions for future improvements. | Demonstrates a thoughtful understanding of the learning to be gained from experience. Provides well – reasoned suggestions for future improvements | Demonstrates a basic understanding of the learning to be gained from experience. Provides reasoned suggestions for future improvements. | Demonstrates a limited understanding of the learning to be gained from experience. Provides some suggestions for future improvement. | Demonstrates little or no understanding of the learning to be gained from experience. Provides little or no suggestions for future improvements. |
| Presentation | Excellent grammar and spelling with superior sentence, paragraph, and overall structure. Uses language that is precise and engaging, with notable sense of voice, and awareness of purpose. Demonstrates control of the operated resources with essentially no errors on referencing and language use | Very good grammar and spelling with very good sentence, paragraph, and overall structure. Uses language that is fluent and original, with evident sense of voice, and awareness of purpose. Demonstrates control of the operated resources, exhibiting occasional errors on referencing and language use | Sound grammar, spelling, and structure but in need of some improvement. Uses basic but appropriate language, with a basic sense of voice, some awareness of purpose. Demonstrates partial control of the operated resources, exhibiting occasional errors on referencing and language use. | Adequate grammar, spelling, and structure, but in need of significant improvement. Uses language that is vague or imprecise for the purpose, with little sense of voice. Demonstrates limited control of the operated resources, exhibiting frequent errors referencing and language use | Poor grammar and spelling and illogical and incoherent structure. Uses language that is unsuitable for the purpose. Demonstrates little or no control of the operated resources, no referencing or |